Explore the 13 essential criteria across 5 justice dimensions
C1: To what extent does the policy strive towards a vision of relational wellbeing? (i.e. centring relationships with all our relatives)
C2: Does the policymaking process explicitly address key aspects of relationships - consent, trust, accountability, and reciprocity?
C3: How does the policy seek to disinvest from systems and structures that perpetrate relational violence? (e.g. industries / economic systems that create environmental harm)
C4: To what extent do Indigenous peoples have agency within colonial decision making processes?
C5: To what extent does the policy enable the capacity for non-human entities to express political agency?
C6: How do the policymaking structures and processes recognise Indigenous decision making institutions and enable Indigenous sovereignty?
C7: Does distributive justice reflect Indigenous definitions of wellbeing and ecological understandings of health? (e.g. including impacts on more-than-human relatives and future generations)
C8: What provisions are there to ensure that benefits and risks of the policy are equitably distributed?
C9: Is the proposed climate action sufficiently strong and rapid to protect against the negative and inequitable effects of climate change?
C10: How are Indigenous worldviews / ontological postions recognised and honoured in the policy?
C11: Is there 'epistemic justice'? How are Indigenous knowledges recognised, developed and expressed in the policy?
C12: Is there consideration of historical and ongoing colonial practices that enables an understanding of the depth and scope of injustices affecting Indigenous communities?
C13: Does the policy provide opportunities to rectify or ameliorate processes that have disenfranchised or harmed Indigenous communities?